Table of Contents

China Slams Trump’s BRICS Tariff Threat: Calls It Economic Coercion

Trump BRICS Tariff Threat is quickly becoming the flashpoint of a renewed global trade conflict. In a strongly worded rebuttal, China has condemned former U.S. President Donald Trump’s threats to impose a 10% additional tariff on BRICS member nations, calling it an act of “economic coercion” that undermines international cooperation and stability.

🇨🇳 China’s Immediate Reaction: “Tariff Wars Have No Winners”

Speaking at a press briefing in Beijing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning stated that “BRICS is not aimed at any third party, nor does it seek confrontation. The use of tariffs to pressure BRICS nations is coercive and unjustified.”

Mao added that China stands firmly against unilateral tariff measures, saying, “Tariff wars produce no winners—only collateral damage to supply chains and the global economy.” The message aligns closely with the resolution adopted at the recent BRICS Summit 2025 in Rio de Janeiro, where leaders collectively condemned protectionist trade policies.

🌍 Context: Why Trump Is Targeting BRICS

Trump’s controversial remarks came via Truth Social, where he vowed to slap an extra 10% tariff on countries that “actively support anti-American BRICS policies.” This announcement followed discussions during the BRICS summit about forming a common currency and strengthening South-South cooperation.

Experts say the move reflects Trump’s 2025 campaign strategy of economic nationalism. However, unlike his 2018–2020 trade policies, this time the scope is broader and could impact key economies like China, India, Brazil, Russia, and South Africa simultaneously.

📉 Market Jitters and Global Concern

The market response was swift. Global stocks dipped, oil prices fluctuated, and supply chain-sensitive sectors showed signs of stress. Financial analysts from Reuters noted that “a new trade war involving BRICS nations could derail fragile post-pandemic recovery in emerging markets.”

Read the Financial Express report for a breakdown of affected sectors and economic projections.

📢 What BRICS Leaders Are Saying

Premier Li Qiang of China urged unity among BRICS members, stating, “We must collectively resist external pressure and accelerate efforts to reform the global governance system.”

India, Brazil, and South Africa have not issued direct responses yet but reaffirmed their commitment to “inclusive multilateralism” during the summit. Russian President Vladimir Putin also criticized “unilateral sanctions and coercive diplomacy.”

💥 Trump BRICS Tariff Threat : Is a New Trade War Coming?

Trade analysts believe that while Trump’s threats are politically motivated, they could escalate into real policy if he secures the 2024 U.S. presidency again. For now, uncertainty looms over multilateral trade agreements and BRICS-led development projects.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) has called for restraint, warning that retaliatory tariffs could paralyze global trade just as it begins to recover post-COVID and amidst ongoing geopolitical tensions.

📊 The Stakes for India and Other BRICS Members

For India, a key BRICS member and strategic trade partner with the U.S., Trump’s tariffs could spell trouble for exports in textiles, pharmaceuticals, and tech services. While India hasn’t officially responded, its finance ministry is reportedly assessing contingency plans.

Read our analysis on Trump’s 2025 Tariff Doctrine for more details.

🧭 Conclusion: BRICS at a Crossroads

China’s response has set the tone for BRICS solidarity in the face of renewed Western economic pressure. The bloc now faces a critical moment to decide whether to counter Trump’s approach with its own set of trade policies or seek diplomatic de-escalation.

As global power structures shift and the U.S. reasserts protectionism, BRICS’ future as a cohesive economic alliance will depend on how it navigates these emerging threats. For now, one thing is clear: the Trump BRICS Tariff Threat is more than just campaign talk—it’s a litmus test for global trade resilience.

Sources: